Important Questions Class 11 Chapter 2.5 Yuvakbharati English Maharashtra Board

Nose versus Eyes

Short Questions  

1. Who wrote the poem “Nose versus Eyes”?

• William Cowper.

2. What is the main theme of the poem?

• Satire on the judiciary system.

3. Who acts as the lawyer in the poem?

• Tongue.

4. Who is the judge in the poem?

• Ear.

5. What causes the dispute between Nose and Eyes?

• Ownership of the spectacles.

6. What does the word “spectacles” mean in the poem?

• Glasses for vision.

7. What does “discerning” mean?

• Showing good judgment.

8. What is the role of Chief Baron Ear?

• To balance the laws.

9. What does the Tongue argue for the Nose?

• Nose has always worn spectacles.

10. How are the spectacles designed for the Nose?

• With a straddle to fit the nose’s ridge.

11. What happens to the Eyes when the Nose wears spectacles?

• Eyes must be shut.

12. What is the tone of the verdict in the poem?

• Solemn and decisive.

13. What does the word “condemn” mean in the poem?

• Express disapproval.

14. What is the profession of William Cowper mentioned in the poem?

• Poet and hymn composer.

15. What is one sensory organ mentioned in the poem?

• Nose.

  Long Questions  

1. What is the poem “Nose versus Eyes” about?

• The poem is a funny satire about a court case between Nose and Eyes fighting over spectacles. It shows how the judiciary system can lack common sense and fairness.

2. Why does the Tongue argue for the Nose in the poem?

• Tongue says the Nose has always worn spectacles, proving possession. It also says spectacles are designed to fit the Nose like a saddle.

3. What is the role of Chief Baron Ear in the poem?

• Chief Baron Ear is the judge who listens to arguments and gives the final verdict. He is known for his talent in making fair decisions.

4. What is the final verdict given by Chief Baron Ear?

• The Nose can wear spectacles, but the Eyes must be shut when it does. This verdict is unfair and mocks the lack of logic in court decisions.

5. How does the poem use humor to criticize the judiciary?

• The poem uses a silly fight between Nose and Eyes to show foolish court arguments. The absurd verdict highlights the lack of empathy and common sense in justice.

6. What are some human tendencies shown in the poem?

• The poem shows tendencies like arguing over trivial things and unfair judgments. It also reflects how people can twist logic to win arguments.

7. Why is the poem considered a satire?

• The poem mocks the judiciary by showing a ridiculous court case with an unfair verdict. It uses humor to criticize the lack of fairness and logic in legal systems.

8. What is the significance of the spectacles in the poem?

• Spectacles represent something valuable that both Nose and Eyes want to claim. Their fight over it shows how people argue over possessions in a silly way.